Skip to content

Development Tools for Polkadot

Development tools for Polkadot cover a wide range of frameworks, libraries, and resources that simplify the creation and integration of specialized blockchains within Polkadot’s secure and scalable multichain environment. By leveraging Substrate’s modular architecture, developers can easily customize core functionalities while benefiting from interoperability across the Polkadot network.

Development Tools for Polkadot


Polkadot Development Videos


Building on Polkadot - Shawn Tabrizi

5 Resources to Learn Polkadot Development - LV

Development Resources for Polkadot


Development Resources

ResourceDescription
Introduction to Polkadot CloudIntroduction to Polkadot Cloud and how it works.
Polkadot Development DocumentationOfficial Polkadot development documentation.
Deploy on Paseo TestnetGuide to deploying on the Paseo testnet.
Build a Custom PalletTutorial on creating a custom pallet for Polkadot.
Set Up a Parachain TemplateInstructions to set up a parachain template.
Polkadot RemixTool for developing smart contracts on Polkadot.
Polkadot FaucetService to request free test tokens for Polkadot testnets.
InteroperabilityDocumentation about interoperability within the Polkadot ecosystem.

Polkadot Developer Tools 2025: PAPI, Dedot, ReactiveDOT, POP CLI, PDP, Paraspell, Bagpipes, Chopsticks

A pragmatic guide to the 2025 Polkadot developer toolkit. We compare PAPI, Dedot, ReactiveDOT, POP CLI, Polkadot Deployment Portal, Paraspell, Bagpipes, and Chopsticks so you know what each does, when to use which, and how they fit together in a modern Polkadot stack.

ELI5: The moving parts you will touch

  • Client libraries help your app talk to chains

    • PAPI is light client first and strongly typed with small bundles for the web
    • Dedot is a lightweight, tree shakable JS client with strong types and multi chain support
    • ReactiveDOT adds reactive front end bindings over PAPI for smooth UI data flows
  • Scaffold and deploy

    • POP CLI scaffolds chains and contracts and automates local networks with a clear developer flow
    • PDP provides a guided rollup deployment experience with a portal to monitor progress
  • Cross chain and no code

    • Paraspell is an XCM SDK that supports both PAPI and polkadot.js styles
    • Bagpipes lets you compose cross chain workflows without code
  • Fork and simulate

    • Chopsticks forks live Polkadot SDK networks locally to replay blocks, test XCM, and mutate state safely

The 2025 toolkit at a glance

  • Front end and data layer: Start with PAPI for typed access. Add ReactiveDOT if you prefer reactive patterns. Consider Dedot when tree shaking and very lean bundles are top priority.
  • CLI and deployment: Use POP CLI for project scaffolding and local flows. Use PDP to deploy a rollup through a guided UI.
  • Interoperability: Use Paraspell to standardize XCM calls. Try Bagpipes for no code demos and operations.
  • Local testing: Use Chopsticks to reproduce bugs, test governance and asset flows, and validate XCM before mainnet.

How the tools differ and work together

PAPI vs Dedot vs ReactiveDOT

  • PAPI

    • Modular TypeScript suite that generates fully typed APIs per chain
    • Browser friendly and small bundles with a light client first approach
    • Good default for modern front ends that want strong typing and DX
  • Dedot

    • Next generation, tree shakable JS client with multi chain ergonomics
    • Easy migration path if you are used to polkadot.js
    • Good when bundle size matters and you want a lean multi chain client
  • ReactiveDOT

    • Reactive layer for React and Vue built on PAPI
    • Caches reads and exposes reactive values across your app
    • Useful when you want composables or hooks and fewer manual subscriptions

Rule of thumb: Start with PAPI. Add ReactiveDOT for reactive UI needs. Choose Dedot if you need the leanest bundles or prefer a familiar polkadot.js style with a modern spin.

POP CLI and PDP

  • POP CLI scaffolds chains and contracts, runs local nodes, and integrates with PDP to hand off deployment
  • PDP aims for a guided rollup deployment on Polkadot Cloud

Why it matters: A realistic 2025 flow looks like prototype locally with POP, fork and test with Chopsticks, deploy to testnets via PDP, then iterate runtime upgrades. PDP abstracts multi step registration and provides a portal to track deployments.

Paraspell and Bagpipes

  • Paraspell standardizes XCM calls and supports both PAPI and polkadot.js which smooths client migrations
  • Bagpipes is a no code builder for cross chain workflows that is great for demos, ops, and stakeholder validation

Chopsticks

Chopsticks creates local copies of live networks so you can replay blocks, tweak state, experiment with XCM, and test OpenGov scenarios without touching production.

Quick start: an end to end dev flow

  1. Scaffold a front end with PAPI and ReactiveDOT

    • Install and generate typed bindings per chain
    • PAPI generates fully typed operations from chain metadata which improves IDE hints and safety
  2. Wire reactive reads

    • Use ReactiveDOT composables or hooks to fetch and cache balances, chain constants, and contract calls with Suspense friendly loading
  3. Prototype cross chain

    • Use Paraspell SDK to declare standard transfers or XCM flows
    • Dual support for PAPI and polkadot.js smooths migrations
  4. Spin up infra with POP CLI

    • Scaffold a parachain or contract project
    • Run a local network and tests from the terminal
  5. Fork mainnet behavior with Chopsticks

    • Reproduce bugs or validate XCM and governance sequences against a local fork before submitting extrinsics on real networks
  6. Deploy a rollup with PDP

    • Use POP integration to kick off a guided deployment and monitor progress in the portal UI

Feature comparison table

ToolWhat it isStand out strengthsTypical useNotes
PAPITS client, light client firstStrong typing, small bundles, browser friendlyFront end and Node dAppsModular design and per chain types
DedotNext gen JS clientLightweight, tree shakable, multi chain ergonomicsLean, multi chain dAppsFamiliar for polkadot.js users
ReactiveDOTReactive front end layerCached reads and reactive values, Suspense friendlyReact and Vue UI data accessBuilt on PAPI
POP CLIScaffold, build, test, deployRapid scaffolding and local networks, PDP handoffChains and contractsClear developer workflow
PDPRollup deployment portalGuided deployment with progress monitoringTestnet or mainnet rollupsIntegrates with POP CLI
ParaspellXCM SDKUnified XCM surface, supports PAPI and polkadot.jsCross chain transfers and routersReduces boilerplate
BagpipesNo code cross chain builderDrag and drop workflowsDemos, ops, non dev flowsGood for stakeholder validation
ChopsticksForking and simulationFork live networks, replay blocks, test XCMPre mainnet validationUseful for governance and asset flows

Common pitfalls and pro tips

  1. Do I need polkadot.js if I am using PAPI or Dedot Not necessarily. PAPI and Dedot are standalone clients. Paraspell can work with either, which helps during migration.

  2. Over fetching in the UI Without a reactive layer you will often re query the same values. ReactiveDOT caches repeated reads and keeps state in sync.

  3. Shipping before simulating Avoid test in prod habits. Use Chopsticks to replay blocks and dry run XCM and governance flows locally.

  4. Treating deployment as bespoke ops With POP to PDP you can standardize rollup deployment, monitor progress, and reduce manual steps.

  5. Cross chain gotchas Abstract with Paraspell. It unifies XCM calls and reduces edge case handling.

FAQs

  1. Is PAPI replacing polkadot.js? PAPI is not an official replacement for polkadot.js. It is the recommended default for most new web dapps thanks to its light client first design, strong TypeScript typing, and small bundles. polkadot.js remains supported for existing stacks, and Dedot is a lean modern alternative. Teams choose based on DX and bundle constraints.

  2. What is the difference between PAPI and Dedot? Both are typed JS or TS clients. PAPI emphasizes light client mode and generated types per chain. Dedot emphasizes lightweight, tree shakable, multi chain ergonomics and migration ease from polkadot.js.

  3. Do I need ReactiveDOT? Not required, but it simplifies front end state by caching reads and exposing reactive values across your app.

  4. How do I deploy a rollup quickly? Use POP CLI for setup, then deploy via PDP with a guided flow that automates the heavy lifting and provides a portal to monitor progress.

  5. Can I simulate OpenGov or XCM locally? Yes. Chopsticks forks live networks, replays blocks, and lets you test XCM and governance flows without touching production.

  6. What is the easiest way to prototype cross chain transfers? Paraspell provides a unified interface for common XCM transfers and supports both client styles.

  7. Any starter templates? Community starters combine PAPI and ReactiveDOT for React and Tailwind stacks. Prefer actively maintained templates.

Conclusion

If you are building on Polkadot in 2025, a sensible default stack is PAPI with ReactiveDOT on the front end, Paraspell for cross chain, Chopsticks for safe simulation, and POP to PDP for deployment. This combo minimizes boilerplate, tightens feedback loops, and takes you from prototype to production faster.

Suggested external sources